While the typical participant banned from drinking diet sodas lost 9 pounds over 12 weeks, those allowed to continue drinking diet soda lost, on average, 13 pounds in the same time period. That's a 4-pound difference.
Hill says that in his clinical experience, many people who have successfully lost significant weight "are heavy users of noncaloric sweeteners."
But why was the diet soda group more successful? The most likely reason is that this group had the easier task.
Cutting calories and boosting exercise takes a lot of willpower. Trying to simultaneously give up something else you regularly enjoy -- such as diet soda -- taxes your ability to stay the course. Most psychologists agree that our willpower is a limited resource.
No offense, but putting credence into a study that only lasted 3 months; resulted in little more than a pound a month difference in the two groups and was sponsored by the American Beverage Association is very short sighted.
The long term issues of drinking diet soda and using artificial sweeteners is well documented as it relates to both physical and psychological well being.
The negative impact of consuming sugar-sweetenedbeverages on weight and other health outcomes hasbeen increasingly recognized; therefore, many peoplehave turned to high-intensity sweeteners like aspartame,sucralose, and saccharin as a way to reduce therisk of these consequences. However, accumulating evidencesuggests that frequent consumers of these sugarsubstitutes may also be at increased risk of excessiveweight gain, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, andcardiovascular disease. This paper discusses these findingsand considers the hypothesis that consumingsweet-tasting but noncaloric or reduced-calorie foodand beverages interferes with learned responses thatnormally contribute to glucose and energy homeostasis.Because of this interference, frequent consumption ofhigh-intensity sweeteners may have the counterintuitiveeffect of inducing metabolic derangements.Artificial sweeteners produce thecounterintuitive effect of inducingmetabolic derangements
Susan E. Swithers
Department of Psychological Sciences and Ingestive Behavior Research Center, Purdue University, 703 Third Street, West
Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
Like other major corporations and industry associations, The American Beverage Association is attempting to protect the market that their members have spent considerable time and money cultivating . It isn't illegal to attempt to sway public opinion nor is it a concern of theirs to outline all possible consequences regarding their products. You no doubt have heard the term "buyer beware". Corporations are not ethical or unethical only the humans within the organizations are ethically bound. The layers of corporate veil conveniently shield the executives from looking beyond profits into the real harm their product may bring upon mankind. To that end, it would be wise for consumers to invest time into the nutritional choices they make and to keep in mind that the Snake promised not to bite the tortoise if he provide him safe passage across the creek. How did that story turn out?
No comments:
Post a Comment